Sunday, April 12, 2009

CHILDHOOD MEMORIES

When I was small, there was a big yard in front of our house. The house was shaped as a Russian letter Г. Close to it's shortest elbow there was a hill with a park on it. We liked to play on that hill.

After the Second World War there was a dancing place left around a huge oak, surrounded by bushes and benches. Summer evenings in Estonia are not too dark, it was enough with light for to see whom you want to dance with.

On another side of the hill there was a two-stored stone house with a cellar windows, visible from the street side. Before a war it was a manor together with a park. In my time this house belonged to pioneers – the communist youth. It was a club with lots of activities for children . My sister tried to learn Esperanto there. We could see airplane models in the cellar windows and hear heels stepping one- two- three in a rhythm of waltz.

On the other side of hill there was a short way to the center of the town. On the hill slope, there were stone blocks with letters graved on stone's surface, made for a decades and decades go, but still visible. I guess there was a cemetery long time ago when this part of the town - almost a city center now! – was a suburb. We liked to glide on the sledge down from the hill at winters, when there was snow. And it was, because winters were much colder 20 years ago.

Near the manor there was a garden with fruit trees, bewildered by that time, but still bringing some sour apples. And who was the first to taste? Of course, boys who played football under that trees.

Across the street in front of the manor there was another park with a huge greenhouse in it. It was a part of pioneers’ club where children could learn plants and biology. It was closed at summers, but we helped the master to water patches and to take away grass. The master was a student at biology department, a son to one famous scientist. He became a politician politician. Every August he was inviting us to a fest with a cake as thanks for our help.

At the longest elbow of our house there was a kindergarten, located in a stylish house with long high windows. The space inside was split into two stores by inbuilt floor inside. Behind a house there was a playing yard. During week-ends kindergarten was closed and we played on their territory. Now this building got a tower to crown it's roof and a parking place to hide a playing ground. There was was a church in that building before war, and it has turned into church again nowadays. That’s why it has such a special high windows.

Later there was a multi store building with underground parking raised right in the center of our yard and shielded as so we couldn’t see the hill and pioneers’ house and greenhouse any more. I don’t know if modern children are allowed to play outside our old houses yard nowadays.

How childish are children nowadays? How do they build their worlds? And what can happen if children don’t live a full life, if they don’t play all that games which have to be played before they meet real life? How can they play their adult roles without training in their own world while they are young?

…There are no pioneers in Estonia now, but passing by the former pioneers’ club I can hear children voices singing songs and laughing in the windows…

5 comments:

MonaLizaOverdrive said...

lalalalalalala

Writing Assignments said...

I thought your text was amazing - evocative, almost hypnotizing in the way you use language to draw such a life-like picture of your childhood. You are a born writer. However (there's always a 'but', isn't there), you haven't quite focused on the question/task. That's somthing to think about for next time.

Structure:
This is not an argumentative text, so the absence of a thesis statement is not a problem. Your paragraphs are unified and coherent.

Language:
Like I said before, your language is very good. But there are always improvements to be made, so I have a few suggestions for you:

-The difference between "it" and "there" can be tricky. The grammatical explanation is that "there" is used when the exaposed subject is a noun phrase - but that explanation is rather difficult. A more useful rule of thumb is that "there" is used when you are talking about things that exist, like light. I would suggest the following: "Summer evenings in Estonia are not too dark; there was enough light to see..." (paragraph 2). There is a similar mistake in paragraph 4.

-Word choice! Letters were "engraved", not "graved", on the blocks of stone (paragraph 4). Also, in paragraph 5, you talk about "bewildered" fruit trees. I know what you mean, but "bewildered" means "confused".

-Prepositions can also be tricky. In paragraph 4, I would suggest: "made decades and decades ago". In other words, "for" needs to be taken out.

-Your pronouns don't always agrees with the nouns. I suggest "those trees" in paragraph 5 and "all those games" in paragraph 9.

Keep it up!
/Teacher

Lars Fredriksson said...

This blog was very interesting and fascinating to read. You have done a great job to get the reader on the hook!

Your introduction was excellent, apart from that a) there should be no "a" before "chosen families" and b) the double negation in the last part. Use either "I had neither…nor..." or "I had never [a] TV or [a] video...".

There should probably be no "what" in the first sentence in paragraph 2. It would be better just to use a semicolon as a connection between the two statements.

Then you make the transition to nowadays, which you accomplish brilliantly by writing “even now, I still…”.

In paragraph 4, I don’t think there should be an “in” after suffer. Then it would look better with “a 13 sequences long story”.

Paragraph 5 also kicks off using another transition “Times were changing”. Excellent! However, there should probably be a “the” in this sentence: “For me, the TV schedule…”, but this part of the English language is indeed tricky!

The starting sentence in the next paragraph is likewise superb, but you probably meant “[a]nd then, the new technology…”.

The verb “waste” is spelled “waste”. “Waist” is a part of the human body.

The closing paragraph is splendid, except that there must be an “are” after “TV shows”.

To summarise, I think the content was brilliant, as well as the division between the paragraphs. It is also great that you put it in a chronological order! However, there are a few small language mistakes as I have pointed out above.

Kim said...

This is an interesting one! I learn many things about your childhood, it makes me really want to experience the children life you had!

However, I want to know more about your feelings towards the children nowadays, the differences between your and their lives and what people should do to improve children's lives.

Thank you for your blog!

DrPettersson said...

Hej,

It was nice to read your assignment.
In my opinion the language you use is really good. It is easy to slip into the environment you describe. In some parts it sounds like an Astrid Lindgren story. I like your excellent way of describing details.

Your text is well structered.

But I'm missing your point of view about upbringing children in general.